Carbon Direct vs Greenly vs KERAMIDA
Side by side: frameworks, pricing, coverage and verified reviews. Information comes from each provider’s listing and from reviewers.
| Feature |
 Carbon Direct
|
 Greenly
|
 KERAMIDA
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | |||
| Type | Services | Software | Services |
| Categories | ESG and sustainability consulting, Carbon accounting and emissions management, SBTi and net-zero target setting | Carbon accounting and emissions management, CSRD/ESRS reporting software, CBAM reporting software | GHG inventory and verification, ESG and sustainability consulting, SBTi and net-zero target setting |
| Headquarters | United States | France | United States |
| Founded | Not stated | Not stated | 1988 |
| Verified by ESGListings | – | – | – |
| Ratings | |||
| Overall | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Ease of use | – | – | – |
| Audit readiness | – | – | – |
| Framework coverage | – | – | – |
| Support | – | – | – |
| Value for money | – | – | – |
| Pricing | |||
| Starting price | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing model | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Free trial | – | – | – |
| Free demo | – | – | – |
| Frameworks supported | |||
| ESRS | – | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISSB (IFRS S1/S2) | – | – | ✓ |
| GRI | – | – | ✓ |
| TCFD | – | – | ✓ |
| CDP | – | – | ✓ |
| GHG Protocol | – | ✓ | ✓ |
| CBAM | – | ✓ | – |
| California SB 253/261 | – | – | ✓ |
| Coverage | |||
| Regions served | Global, North America | European Union, United Kingdom, North America | Global, North America |
| Company sizes | Mid-market, Enterprise | SME, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Deployment | Not stated | Cloud (SaaS) | Not stated |
| Languages | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
Listing details are provided by each company and checked when a listing is marked Verified. Ratings come from verified reviewers. Sponsored listings are paid placements and don’t affect this comparison.