Carbon Footprint Ltd vs KlimAktiv vs Planted
Side by side: frameworks, pricing, coverage and verified reviews. Information comes from each provider’s listing and from reviewers.
| Feature |
 Carbon Footprint Ltd
|
 KlimAktiv
|
 Planted
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | |||
| Type | Software and services | Software and services | Software |
| Categories | Carbon accounting and emissions management, ESG and sustainability consulting, GHG inventory and verification | Carbon accounting and emissions management, ESG and sustainability consulting | CSRD/ESRS reporting software, ESG reporting and disclosure software, Carbon accounting and emissions management |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | Germany | Germany |
| Founded | Not stated | Not stated | 2021 |
| Verified by ESGListings | – | – | – |
| Ratings | |||
| Overall | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Ease of use | – | – | – |
| Audit readiness | – | – | – |
| Framework coverage | – | – | – |
| Support | – | – | – |
| Value for money | – | – | – |
| Pricing | |||
| Starting price | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing model | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Free trial | – | – | – |
| Free demo | – | – | – |
| Frameworks supported | |||
| ESRS | ✓ | – | ✓ |
| TCFD | ✓ | – | – |
| CDP | ✓ | – | – |
| GHG Protocol | ✓ | – | – |
| California SB 253/261 | ✓ | – | – |
| Coverage | |||
| Regions served | Global, United Kingdom | European Union | Global, European Union |
| Company sizes | SME, Mid-market, Enterprise | SME, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Languages | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
Listing details are provided by each company and checked when a listing is marked Verified. Ratings come from verified reviewers. Sponsored listings are paid placements and don’t affect this comparison.