Carbon Trust vs KERAMIDA vs StepChange
Side by side: frameworks, pricing, coverage and verified reviews. Information comes from each provider’s listing and from reviewers.
| Feature |
 Carbon Trust
|
 KERAMIDA
|
StepChange |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | |||
| Type | Services | Services | Software |
| Categories | ESG and sustainability consulting, GHG inventory and verification, SBTi and net-zero target setting | GHG inventory and verification, ESG and sustainability consulting, SBTi and net-zero target setting | Carbon accounting and emissions management, Supply chain ESG and due diligence |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | United States | United States |
| Founded | Not stated | 1988 | Not stated |
| Verified by ESGListings | – | – | – |
| Ratings | |||
| Overall | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Ease of use | – | – | – |
| Audit readiness | – | – | – |
| Framework coverage | – | – | – |
| Support | – | – | – |
| Value for money | – | – | – |
| Pricing | |||
| Starting price | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing model | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Free trial | – | – | – |
| Free demo | – | – | – |
| Frameworks supported | |||
| ESRS | – | ✓ | – |
| ISSB (IFRS S1/S2) | – | ✓ | ✓ |
| GRI | – | ✓ | ✓ |
| TCFD | – | ✓ | ✓ |
| CDP | – | ✓ | – |
| GHG Protocol | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| BRSR | – | – | ✓ |
| California SB 253/261 | – | ✓ | – |
| Coverage | |||
| Regions served | Global | Global, North America | Global, North America |
| Company sizes | SME, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Industries | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Deployment | Not stated | Not stated | Cloud (SaaS), ERP and finance integrations, API |
| Languages | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
Listing details are provided by each company and checked when a listing is marked Verified. Ratings come from verified reviewers. Sponsored listings are paid placements and don’t affect this comparison.