Carbonstop vs Climate Friendly vs KERAMIDA
Side by side: frameworks, pricing, coverage and verified reviews. Information comes from each provider’s listing and from reviewers.
| Feature |
 Carbonstop
|
Climate Friendly |
 KERAMIDA
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | |||
| Type | Software and services | Services | Services |
| Categories | Carbon accounting and emissions management, ESG and sustainability consulting, SBTi and net-zero target setting | Carbon accounting and emissions management, ESG and sustainability consulting | GHG inventory and verification, ESG and sustainability consulting, SBTi and net-zero target setting |
| Headquarters | China | Australia | United States |
| Founded | 2011 | Not stated | 1988 |
| Verified by ESGListings | – | – | – |
| Ratings | |||
| Overall | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Ease of use | – | – | – |
| Audit readiness | – | – | – |
| Framework coverage | – | – | – |
| Support | – | – | – |
| Value for money | – | – | – |
| Pricing | |||
| Starting price | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing model | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Free trial | – | – | – |
| Free demo | – | – | – |
| Frameworks supported | |||
| ESRS | ✓ | – | ✓ |
| ISSB (IFRS S1/S2) | – | – | ✓ |
| GRI | – | – | ✓ |
| TCFD | – | – | ✓ |
| CDP | ✓ | – | ✓ |
| GHG Protocol | – | – | ✓ |
| CBAM | ✓ | – | – |
| California SB 253/261 | – | – | ✓ |
| Coverage | |||
| Regions served | APAC | APAC | Global, North America |
| Company sizes | Not stated | Not stated | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Not stated | Not stated |
| Languages | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
Listing details are provided by each company and checked when a listing is marked Verified. Ratings come from verified reviewers. Sponsored listings are paid placements and don’t affect this comparison.